In the 8th Century, in the city of Frentanese, the pastor of St. Legontian was having doubts about the Real Presence in the Eucharist. His doubts were entirely dispelled when the Host literally transformed into live flesh and the wine literally became blood. The Host has been miraculously preserved to this day, and has undergone in-depth scientific analysis which have been proven and documented. Both the flesh and the blood were found to be real and from the human species. The flesh consists of muscular tissue from the heart, containing the mycocardium, the vagus nerve and the left ventricle. The elements chloride, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium and calcium were found in the blood. Both the flesh and the blood have the blood type AB (which is consistent with all other substantiated Eucharistic miracles).

 

In the mid-1200s, a woman in the city of Santarem tried to take a Host from Mass to a sorceress in order to make some sort of "potion." She hid it in her head-scarf, and while walking down the street, it began to bleed. Frightened, the woman took it home and placed it in a chest. During the night, she and her husband were awakened by a bright light coming from the chest, and they saw a vision of angels adoring the bleeding Host. They reported it to the priest, and he returned the Host back to the church, where it still remains today.  

This miracle dates back to the 1300s. A priest who was going to visit the sick and administer the sacrament irreverently placed the Host between the pages of his breviary. When he opened it again, he found that it had turned to blood, and where the Host had been, there were dark red circles on the pages. Those pages can still be seen in Cascia, Italy now.

One of the most amazing Eucharistic miracles that I’ve ever heard about was the Bleeding Host of Betania (Venezuala) only ten years ago. Pilgrims were in the adoration chapel when the Host gave the appearance of having a heart beating in the center. The thing that makes it the most incredible, though, is the fact that there is actually video footage of the miracle. Read about it here and watch it the youtube video here.

Check out this link, where you can read many more stories of incredible miracles relating to the Real Presence.

Don’t forget to take some time to meditate on Christ’s sacrifice for us today on Good Friday. I hope you all have a blessed Easter season!

Pax Christi,
~the Catholic apologist

We were recently visiting with some extended family in New England.  During the time we were there, we visited the Baptist church where my mom attended growing up.  It had been a couple of months since I had sat through a sermon in an Evangelical church.  For some reason, this sermon seemed particularly directed against the Catholic Church.  It was full of not-so-subtle references to how Catholics are so supposedly deceived.  At the end of the sermon, they distributed their monthly communion.  The pastor was very clear in saying that the "crackers and juice" were "only symbols".  He took great effort in explaining to the congregation that communion was "not a sacrament in any way", but "simply an ordinance."  He mentioned that the Catholic Church actually believed that the "crackers and juice" became the real body and blood of Jesus Christ.  The deacons and other people in the church grimaced and shook their heads in disgust.  "That’s just ridiculous,"  the pastor declared.

His last statement really got me thinking.  At first, when I heard it, I felt insulted and offended.  He was belittling my beliefs right in front of me.  However, I came to realize the truth in his statement.  Let me explain…

Pastor R. certainly wasn’t the first person to call the Eucharist "ridiculous".  In fact, we see people doing it right in the Gospel of St. John.  When you read this passage from John 6:55-66, try reading it as if you’ve never read it before.  Come at it with a fresh mind and see what you can get out of it. 

For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 

He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. 

As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

These things he said in the synogogue, as he taught in Capernaum.

Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?

When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

But there are some of you that believe not.  For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.

Jesus lost "many disciples" over the issue of the Eucharist.  They thought that the teaching was so ridiculous that they simply left him.  They didn’t say, "Oh, we’re supposed to eat a mere symbol of his body; I can handle that!"  They deserted Him. 

Many other people have deserted Jesus because they found His teachings to be "ridiculous".  We as Christians really do believe in some pretty crazy things.  We believe that God is One, and yet He is three distinct Persons.  We believe that He made the world out of nothing.  We believe that He loved us so much that He sent His only Son into the world as a human baby.  We believe that He is 100% God and 100% man.  We believe that He died a cruel criminal’s death for our salvation from sin.  We believe that He rose again from the grave, and that He ascended back into heaven.  These are all mysteries to us.  We can’t claim to fully understand them.  We don’t know why or how God does these things.  Many people would call them ridiculous. 

I don’t remember which saint said this, but he made this point, which I thought was very good:

Jesus says, "This is my body." 
You say, "This is not His body."
Who should I believe?

If Jesus says something, we shouldn’t be too quick to condemn it because it’s "ridiculous".  I would rather err on the side of being too literal than miss out on something so huge.

If I’m going to be so extreme as to believe that God became man, that He was tortured for my sake, and that He rose from the dead, I might as well go all the way and believe that He enters the form of bread in communion so that I can bodily receive Him.  I’m not going to accept one as being reasonable and the other as crazy.  They’re both crazy.  But, I can’t think of anything more beautiful.

If I believe in it, what do I lose if it’s wrong? 

What do I gain if it’s right?

Pax Christi,
~the Catholic apologist

—EDIT—

Okay, I have messed around with Feedblitz, and I think I have it back in article format.  Let me know if it’s still not working for you!

~TCA

—END EDIT—

It seems like there’s something weird going on with the email subscriptions.  FeedBlitz changed their format and now the updates have gone screwy.  I have tried to get it back to the original, but for some reason it’s not working.  It won’t actually send the articles. 

Sooooooo…I am trying to come up with some sort of alternative.  If you (the subscribers) could let me know how you’d prefer to have the updates emailed to you, that’d be really helpful.  I could easily send them from my own personal account.  I could also try the HSB subscription setup, however, the few times that I’ve tried it hasn’t been successful.  I will have to work the bugs out.

Thanks for your feedback!!  Sorry about the confusion. 

Pax Christi,
~the Catholic apologist

Mary was created only for God, and it is unthinkable that she should reserve even one soul for herself.  On the contrary she leads every soul to God and to union with him.  Mary is the wonderful echo of God.  The more a person joins himself to her, the more effectively she unites him to God.  When we say "Mary", she re-echoes "God".  ~ St. Louis de Montfort, The Secret of Mary

We should always be striving to become closer to God in our everyday lives.  So, how do we become closer to God through Mary?  Why should we seek to know Him more by going through her? 

First of all, I want to go straight to Mary’s words in the New Testament:

Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it done to me according to thy word. ~ Luke 1:38

The first thing that she teaches us is humble submission to God’s will. 

My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.  For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.  For he that is mighty hath done great things; and holy is his name.  And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation. ~ Luke 1:46-52

In her "Magnificat" she shows us total glorification of God.  That’s entirely why she exists – for God’s glory.  In fact, that’s the reason why we all exist.  Mary gives us the picture of what God’s glorious purpose is for us.

Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. ~ John 2:5

These are Mary’s constant words to us.  She stands and points right to Christ, leading us to Him through obedience to His Word.  She’s anything but an obstacle to Christ.  Mary’s whole purpose is to lead us to Him. 

Mary is one of the most beautiful creations of God.  Everything that she has comes from Him.  Think of her as a painter’s masterpiece.  Is a painter upset when people gather around his artwork and admire it? 

What about nature?  Mountains, oceans, forests, deserts?  Does God take offense when we stand in awe of His earthly creation? 

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork. ~ Psalm 19:1

If nature declares God’s glory, how much more can Mary – Christ’s own mother, declare His glory?  If nature can lead us closer to Him, how much more can she, the closest person to Him, bring us to a more intimate relationship with Him? 

Think about it.  If you want to get to know someone better, do you think it’d be helpful to start up a good relationship with his or her mother?  Of course!  Why is that?  Because a mother is the person who is knows her child the best.  She has a very intimate bond with her child – one that no one else can claim to have.  It’s the same with Mary, except that not only is she Jesus’ mother – she’s also ours (I’ll be writing an entry about that in the future). 

God gave Himself completely to us.  How?  By coming in human form – through Mary (literally).  Why should we not give ourselves completely to Him through Mary as well? 

There are so many things to write about Mary.  I’ve already posted an entry about how she is the Ark of the New Covenant.  In the future, I’d like to write about her role as the Queen Mother of the Kingdom of God, mother of all Christians, and how she’s affected the world through different apparitions. 

Here are a couple of good online resources: Catholic Answers: Mary and the Saints, Defenders of the Catholic Faith (Steve Ray) – scroll down for the list of articles about Mary, and the Phatmass Catholic Defense Directory

Pax Christi,
~the Catholic apologist

And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. ~ Matthew 23:9

The above verse is cause of some controversy between Catholics and separated Christian brethren.  Some say that the command to "call no man father" directly applies to the titles given to priests in the Catholic Church.  We call all priests "father" because we are their spiritual children.  However, these people fail to recognize that the directly literal interpretation of this verse condemns far more than just the title of priests.

Take for example, our biological fathers.  If we were to interpret Matthew 23:9 literally, that would mean that none of us could call any man upon the earth "father".  To really obey the Scriptures at face value, we would refrain from calling our actual fathers "father".  Of course, that would be simply absurd.  Even in the NT we see clear examples of people calling their fathers by name.  Not only that, but it was apparently acceptable to refer to ancestors by the name of "father" as well.

To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; the oath which he sware to our father Abraham. ~ Luke 1:72-73

Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. ~ John 8:56 [Jesus speaking to the Jews]

In Romans 9:10, Paul also speaks of "our father Isaac".  It’s obvious that Jesus didn’t really command us to literally refrain from calling anyone on earth "father".  He had a deeper meaning that went beyond the simple face value.

First of all, let’s look at the context of the verse in Matthew 23, starting with verse 1:

1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,

2 Saying The scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:

3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. 

4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

5 But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,

6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synogogues,

7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.

8 But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.

9 And call no man your father upon the earth; for one is your father which is in heaven.

10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.

11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.

12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.

13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!  for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye that are entering them to go in.

As you can see, these thirteen verses (and the entire chapter) were directed toward the scribes and Pharisees.  The overall purpose was to point out their pride in being in a superior position.  So, how does "call no man father" fit in with that context?  Notice the verses before and after verse 9.  Verse 8 says, "be ye not called Rabbi" and verse 10 "neither be ye called masters".  Does this forbid anyone from having those titles?  Jesus in John 3:10 questions Nicodemus saying, "Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?"  Again, there must be a deeper meaning than the face value. 

Jesus was condemning the Pharisee’s vainglory.  They were flashing around their good works and taking selfish advantage of their authority.  That was why Jesus said, "whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted."  He was trying to show them the foolishness of their pride.  What kind of Rabbis were they compared to God, who is Master of all?  Why were they so proud of being called "father" when they were so inferior to the heavenly Father?  They were trying to set themselves up as ultimate authorities rather than recognizing that God was the source of all authority. 

Again, I am going to come back to the literal interpretation of Matthew 23:9.  If Jesus really meant it literally, that would mean that we could not have spiritual "fathers".  But, frequently throughout the NT, we see references to spiritual fatherhood.

I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten in my bonds. ~ Philemon 1:10

To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour. ~ Titus 1:4

For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church. ~ 1 Corinthians 4:17

Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. ~ 2 Timothy 2:1

Paul was a spiritual father to many.  Although we may not recognize it, we all have many spriritual fathers in our own lives.  They are those who have led us to Christ.  The priests are our especial fathers because they lead us to Christ in the most intimate and phenomenal way: they give us Christ in the Eucharist.  That is why we call the priests "father".  Not because they take the place of our Heavenly Father, but because they lead us to Him. 

Pax Christi,
~the Catholic apologist

« Older entries